黃毓x正契弟
-
my opinion,
<br>
<br>You eat shxt lah. You must be working for fxxking Li family.
-
hehehe...
<br>不過我都會支持你fxxk li's family 既..
<br>至於黃生都係繼續fxxk 政府, 社會需要人分工合作....哈哈哈
<br>加油!!!
-
my opinion,
<br>
<br>Now I like you much better. Let's fxxk HK government and all the rich tycoons (oops, I am not rich enough to be fxxked)
<br>
<br>:-)
-
批評容易建設難!!!
<br>
<br>其實如果再做多d實際有建設既行動，我諗大家會對佢更受落!
-
對極!!
<br>只識用口, 唔會用手
<br>
-
香港人好拿實際~~
<br>吾會因為你做幾場出位既戲，有話題，咁就受落~~~~
<br>當然小弟認為佢地既聲音係好重要，
<br>往往要有人以咁激進既行動去吸引其他人忽略左既問題，
<br>但係下下都攪破壞，
<br>令到事件衰上加衰，咁又有邊個得益呢...
-
你地吾好再講黃生丶黃生係我地女王,至愛,至忠心士兵丶毎日做一切都為討好女王喜歡呀。
-
NONONO replied @ 2009-02-26 9:51 am
<br>
<br>你話政府做完D衰野無人會出聲,毓民佢地要俾全世界讉責,你話岩唔岩
<br>______________________________________________________________
<br>
<br>我反而覺得政府成日比人"趙"，毓民類人士經常非正途挑戰法律喎！
-
Skymen replied @ 2009-02-26 2:23 pm
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>我反而覺得政府成日比人"趙"，毓民類人士經常非正途挑戰法律喎！
<br>
<br>-----------------------
<br>我肯定佢無犯法!
-
我認為現今的政府是弱能的，不過香港社會如果走上完全的民選制度，發展會如何？
<br>
<br>在美國，他們實行民選制度是成功的，但也會出現小布這類的極端主義者，因為他行的極端霸權主義，忽略了本土經濟的金融危機(次按問題)金融海難他是難辭其疚。
<br>
<br>而且，在美國，他們的總統有權自行組織內閣，真正有才華的，有建樹的也是那麼內閣官員，他們又是否民選？
<br>
<br>而代入現在的香港，政治及決策訓練的人少之又少，本來我也寄望黃先生等人是有能人士，站出來說出問題"並提供有限方法"，贏得有理智的民眾的支持。可惜的是我只見投訴，卻見不到實質的建議，而且帶了一點對敵人支持他便反對，敵人反對他便支持的單純對抗行為，我感覺他比之政府更為低能，甚至可以用無能形容他。但大部分市民又非常受落，如果香港實行民選制度，香港完了！我寧願選擇有能的獨裁也不選擇無能的民主！
-
my opinion replied @ 2009-02-26 2:34 pm
<br>
<br>Skymen replied @ 2009-02-26 2:23 pm
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>我反而覺得政府成日比人"趙"，毓民類人士經常非正途挑戰法律喎！
<br>
<br>-----------------------
<br>我肯定佢無犯法!
<br>___________________________________________
<br>
<br>說明一點: 我沒有說他犯法，我只是說他挑戰法律而已，別曲解我的文意！
<br>他挑戰法律的地方，我們可以從立法會會議記錄可以看到他有多少次違規行為就可以知道了！(立法會會議記錄都是公開的資料來的，請到政府網頁查找！)
-
skymen,言之有理。
-
Skymen,
<br>
<br>唔通唔行民主就唔會極端極端霸權主義????
<br>我只可以講獨裁既極端主義比起民主而產生既極端主義, 死怖好多倍!!!
-
請你用心分析咩叫民主字眼・邊位係為港民・邊位係借-為港民服務為直口,來攪事呢?
-
my opinion replied @ 2009-02-26 3:02 pm
<br>
<br>Skymen,
<br>
<br>唔通唔行民主就唔會極端極端霸權主義????
<br>我只可以講獨裁既極端主義比起民主而產生既極端主義, 死怖好多倍!!!
<br>______________________________________________
<br>
<br>當然啦！如果妳問我，秦始皇又好，希特勒也好，只要是極端主義，後果都是嚴重的，而我想帶出的問題不是獨裁與民主的問題，而是有能的和無能的問題和香港是否合適民主的問題！
<br>
<br>可要知道少數服從多數也不一定是正確的！比如有5個人，而民選的基本理念就是少數服從多數。如果5個人當中，2個只有1000元，2個只有10000元，而1個卻有100000元的話，其餘4人贊成平均重新分配，妳覺得正確嗎？而妳認為要求重新分配的動議通過的機率高嗎？代入現在的香港，社會貧富懸殊問題嚴重，那麼出現以上問題的可能性大嗎？如果出現了相似的問題，如增加富者稅收作為支持弱小社群的保助，那麼投資者會認為香港是否一個合適的投資環境嗎？連鎖反應下企業轉移，失業問題更加惡化，到那麼遠才發現得到的問題，今日的香港市民妳認為有能力看得到嗎！？
-
要能夠意識得到問題的存在，懂得深入分析問題，和提出有效的解決方案才可能對一些問題作出最正確的決策！如果變成民選方式，就會變成需要每一個市民都有以上能力的作出選擇！那麼妳告訴我立法會上有那一個人比曾先生更有能力和資格作為香港的行政長官？
-
討論...完了嗎？
-
"去年立法會選舉,黃毓民講明入到議會會用激烈手法鬧政府,結果高票當選(好似是九龍西第一 or 第二高票),證明有不少市民支持佢"
<br>
<br>Tell him come to Hong Kong Island and see how many votes he will get!
<br>
<br>
<br>In my opinion 黃毓民 is a total loser. He almost failed in everything he does...his newspaper, his restaurants...etc. yet he captures the heart of so many "low-income" people who think yelling slogans will change the reality.
-
georgewbush replied @ 2009-02-26 4:56 pm
<br>
<br>"去年立法會選舉,黃毓民講明入到議會會用激烈手法鬧政府,結果高票當選(好似是九龍西第一 or 第二高票),證明有不少市民支持佢"
<br>
<br>Tell him come to Hong Kong Island and see how many votes he will get!
<br>
<br>
<br>In my opinion 黃毓民 is a total loser. He almost failed in everything he does...his newspaper, his restaurants...etc. yet he captures the heart of so many "low-income" people who think yelling slogans will change the reality.
<br>_________________________________________
<br>
<br>有如樓上布先生所說，黃先生只不過有一個小聰明的腦袋，選擇一個有利的地方參加選舉，但卻沒有政治和管理智慧作一個管理者！
-
To all brothers and sisters,
<br>
<br>In the world of politics there is not ONE absolute truth and not one single answer to solve problem.
<br>
<br>黃毓民 and his pals insist their truth is the ONLY truth and against anything other than that and leave no room for compromise.
<br>
<br>
-
所以我不認為現在是一個合適的時間普選！ 囧rz
-
管理者? He only took advantage of those helpless citizens who tend to blame everything or everyone but themselves. Also thanks to #18 newspaper which featured his column and news everyday during election,
<br>
<br>A lawmaker(LEGCO member) is a lawbreaker already is a joke by itself.
-
I never favor 普選 in Hong Kong.
<br>
<br>Look at what kind of newspapers we have and you will see what quality of citizen we are.(people demand it and that's why the print it)
<br>
<br>Don't tell people those are the main newspapers of "Asia's world city"
-
and Mr Wong has a thick skin, he never feel he is an ass.
<br>
<br>when he lost lot of money, he disappeared from his family, just run a way, let his wife to open a noodles shop alone for her living and to feed their son.
<br>
<br>his son high "coke", is show he has no education, not a man.
<br>
<br>now he only know yelling yelling and throwing the banaba, what else can he do?
<br>
-
"and Mr Wong has a thick skin, he never feel he is an ass.
<br>
<br>when he lost lot of money, he disappeared from his family, just run a way, let his wife to open a noodles shop alone for her living and to feed their son.
<br>
<br>his son high "coke", is show he has no education, not a man.
<br>
<br>now he only know yelling yelling and throwing the banaba, what else can he do? "
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>I don't blame him; I blame our highly educated voters in kowloon side.
-
呢度開始有政治洗腦啦 ...
-
點洗法?
<br>咪講d唔講d
-
我覺得不同政治理念的人好難說服對方, 基本上係各自表述
-
"我覺得不同政治理念的人好難說服對方, 基本上係各自表述"
<br>
<br>The art of politics is not about to 說服對方, but to willing to sit down, listen and compromise.
<br>
<br>I wouldn't take "public opinion" too seriously or else we don't need a leader; all we need is Mr. Chung Ting Yiu to hand out questionaire and govern based on its result.
-
. replied @ 2009-02-26 5:38 pm
<br>
<br>呢度開始有政治洗腦啦 ...
<br>
<br>-----------------------
<br>無錯!
<br>
<br>好多討論區都開始有政治洗腦!
-
we are talking about Mr Wong's behaviour, he behaved like a mong kok black background yesterday.
<br>
-
我在洗別人的腦嗎？可能吧！？因為每一個人我每一句話都有可能影響對方，那就是所謂的洗腦吧，是嗎？不過如果一個人沒有用腦袋分析問題，沒有做資料搜集而跟別人人雲亦雲，那麼我覺得在香港暫時透過洗腦而成為最大得益者可算是黃先生了！我說的可能是危言聳聽，不過我說的現像就沒有道理了嗎？黃先生在大街上用任何方法宣揚自己的道理是理所當然，本人在論壇上提出的就是洗腦行為，不應發言，言論自由是黃先生等人或其支持者的專利了嗎？還是言論自由根本是名存實亡？定還是說我在洗腦的人才是強暴言論自由的強姦犯！？
-
還有一件事，我在參與討論之前，稍稍在政府網頁做了少少research，說我洗腦的人們，妳們又做了什麼，知道什麼來支持他們呢？還是妳們跟他們其實也只是演員和粉絲般的關係呢？
-
痴q線, 講下野又話人洗腦
<br>洗你老味呀
<br>
-
我相信我提出的討論多半在我有生之年等不到回覆，讓我終於覺得累而死心了，打算結束之後對方就會得意的跳出來覺得"你們不能打敗我喇"。
-
又是一班「略過不回應的視為略過」的人們，你們希望把我的話永遠略過嗎？
-
看來，討論結束了！
-
痴9線, 喺R版講政治, 居心何在 ??
<br>以前都唔見, 而家無啦啦出現係度講, 都唔知為咩 ??
<br>真係痴9線
<br>
-
北角真係好多寫手 ...
-
我係洗你腦 ! 吹呀 !
<br>黃毓我地支持你!!
<br>
-
如果5個人當中，2個只有1000元，2個只有10000元，而1個卻有100000元的話，其餘4人贊成平均重新分配，妳覺得正確嗎？.......正確!!!!我係真真正正無產階級......香港共產黨發起人......
-
如果做到真正既無產
<br>我又唔介意!
-
九唔搭八 replied @ 2009-02-26 10:54 pm
<br>
<br>痴9線, 喺R版講政治, 居心何在 ??
<br>以前都唔見, 而家無啦啦出現係度講, 都唔知為咩 ??
<br>真係痴9線
<br>___________________________________________________________
<br>
<br>的確，我們雙方都不應在R版論政治，不過那都不可以說是討論者的問題，而只可以說是樓主的問題，難道他發表有問題的言論，我們都不可以反駁？何況R版討論任何其他問題都可以，為什麼只有政治不可以討論？我仍找不到有版規作如此限制！